The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal by Schlumberger regarding a patent infringement case.
This case, originally filed in Houston in 2014, seeks to determine whether companies can recoup profits on patent infringement claims outside the United States. A federal jury in Houston awarded $12.5 million in royalties and $93.4 million in lost profits to WesternGeco, the Schlumberger subsidiary plaintiff in the case.
On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's finding by holding that Schlumberger could not recoup lost profits because U.S. Patent law does not apply outside of the country.
Schlumberger appealed the Court of Appeals findings to the Supreme Court who recently decided to hear this case. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of Schlumberger, companies who previously relied on patented US technology would have to pay for the usage of the technology, which would greatly hurt production and profits for some smaller companies.
Related Categories :
Legal / Lawsuit
More Legal / Lawsuit News
-
US Well Services Files Lawsuit Against Halliburton, Cimarex
-
DC Court of Appeals Rules to Stay Dakota Access Shutdown
-
Large Swath of Oklahoma Land Falls Within Indian Reservation, US Supreme Court Rules
-
EagleClaw Midstream Sues Energy Spectrum/CapRock
-
PE-Backed E&P Sues Continental for Failure to Close $200 Million Deal -
United States News >>>
-
A Quiet Capital Pattern Is Forming in North American Upstream — and Almost No One Is Talking About It -

-
EIA’s “Glut” Calls: The 2025 Surplus Claim — and How 2021–2024 Forecasts Actually Held Up

-
New E&P Scores Capital; Heading To the MidCon Region -

-
2025 Forecast : Dangerous Time Ahead -

-
Petrus Resources Ltd. First Quarter 2023 Results
4.jpg&new_width=60&new_height=60&imgsize=false)
